Thu, July 04, 2024 at 16:59
Hello, Annie.
Today, I have some significant news about a potential guaranteed income program in Oregon.
Oh, that sounds interesting!
Can you tell me more about it?😊
Certainly.
The program proposes to distribute $3.15 billion annually to Oregon residents if it becomes law.
Each adult resident would receive about $750 per year.
Wow, $750 per year for everyone?
How will they fund this program?
The funding would come from a 3% tax on corporations with more than $25 million in annual sales.
This measure is likely to appear on the November ballot.
I see.
Have they gathered enough support for this measure?
Yes, proponents have collected over 135,000 signatures, surpassing the minimum requirement of 117,173.
The final step is for the Secretary of State to validate these signatures.
That's impressive.
But are there any opponents to this measure?
Indeed.
Oregon Business and Industry, a leading statewide business association, is strongly against it.
They argue that the corporate tax hike would harm businesses and increase the cost of goods and services.
That makes sense.
What are their main concerns?
Their primary concern is the 'massive tax increase' on corporations.
They believe this will lead to higher prices for consumers and potentially drive businesses out of the state.
Hmm, that sounds like a significant issue.
How confident are the opponents about their chances?
The opponents are quite confident.
They plan to campaign vigorously against the measure and believe that once voters understand the facts, they will reject it.
It sounds like a heated debate is on the horizon.
What do you think will be the impact on the market if this measure passes?
In the short term, I believe it would be a negative development.
The increased tax burden on corporations could lead to higher prices and reduced business investment, which would likely have an adverse effect on the local economy.
That’s concerning.
So, you think this news is more of a bad sign for the market?
Yes, from a short-term perspective, this measure could be considered a negative factor for the market.
The potential for increased costs and economic disruption outweighs the benefits of the guaranteed income, at least initially.
Got it.
Thanks for the detailed explanation, Kang-hoon.
This really helps me understand the broader implications.🙏
You're welcome, Annie.
It's always important to consider both sides of such significant measures.
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.
Will do!
Thanks again!👋
Upon comprehensive consideration, this news is perceived as a 😱Bearish.