Thu, September 19, 2024 at 09:37
Hello, Annie.
Today, I have some intriguing news about the ongoing lawsuit between the US SEC and Coinbase.
The SEC has requested an extension to complete fact discovery until February next year.
Oh, really?
Why do they need an extension?🤔
The SEC claims that the case has extensive discovery requirements, including the production of hundreds of thousands of documents.
They are currently reviewing at least 133,582 unique documents.
Wow, that's a lot of documents!😮 So, both Coinbase Inc and Coinbase Global Inc agreed to this extension?
Yes, both parties have agreed to the requested extension.
This will be the first extension of the deadline to complete fact discovery in this case.
Interesting.
Do you think the timing of the extension, which is after the 2024 US presidential elections, is significant?
Indeed, the timing has raised some speculation.
Some believe it might be a strategic move to avoid any political influence on the case.
That makes sense.
What about Coinbase's progress on crypto regulations?
Any updates there?
Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, has disclosed progress regarding their FOIA suit against the FDIC.
They are seeking the pause letters sent to financial institutions that debanked crypto firms.
Pause letters?
What are those?🤔
Pause letters are communications from the FDIC to financial institutions, advising them to halt services to crypto firms.
The court has ordered the FDIC to provide a Vaughn Index, which is a FOIA privilege log.
I see.
And what about the broader implications for crypto regulations?
Lawyer James Murphy and Paul Grewal believe that applying more pressure will reveal the truth about Operation Choke Point 2.0, a supposed regulatory effort to debank crypto firms.
Operation Choke Point 2.0?
That sounds serious.
Why isn't Congress looking into this?
That's a good question.
Murphy has criticized Congress for not performing its oversight function, leaving public companies like Coinbase to take on that role.
That's quite a burden for a company.
What about the political landscape?
Any opposition to crypto legislation?
Yes, Democrat leaders are against crypto legislation, claiming that bipartisan efforts like FIT 21 and the rollback of SAB 121 accounting rules are harmful and driven by extreme MAGA Republicans.
And what is Coinbase's stance on this?
Grewal argues that these efforts are not just MAGA-driven but are about representatives doing their job.
Republican Representative Richie Torres has also questioned the classification of Ether as a security, advocating for separate regulations for decentralized crypto assets.
That's a lot to take in.
So, do you think this news is good or bad for the market?
I would consider this news to be a negative development.
The delay in discovery prolongs the uncertainty surrounding the case, which is likely to keep market participants cautious.
Additionally, the political and regulatory challenges add further complexity and risk to the crypto market.
Upon comprehensive consideration, this news is perceived as a 😱Bearish.