Fri, September 20, 2024 at 09:15
Hello, Annie.
Today, I want to discuss the current state of stablecoins in 2024, based on a recent report from CoinGecko.
Hi, Kang-hoon!
That sounds interesting.😊 What does the report say about the market cap of stablecoins?
The report states that fiat-backed stablecoins reached a market cap of $161.2 billion in 2024.
However, this is still below their 2021 peak of $181.7 billion.
Oh, I see.
So, they haven't fully recovered yet.
What about commodity-backed stablecoins?
Commodity-backed stablecoins have grown by 18.1% in 2024, reaching $1.3 billion.
However, they still represent only 0.8% of the fiat-backed stablecoin market.
That's quite a small portion.
Are there any dominant players in the stablecoin market?
Yes, the market is heavily dominated by Tether (USDT), USD Coin (USDC), and Dai (DAI), which control 94% of the market.
USDT alone takes up 70.9%.
Wow, that's a huge dominance by just a few players.
How many people are actually holding these stablecoins?
According to the report, there are 8.7 million addresses holding stablecoins.
Among them, USDT, USDC, and DAI account for 97.1% of the total.
That's a lot of holders!
Do stablecoins maintain their $1 peg well?
Stablecoins often struggle to maintain their $1 peg, especially during uncertain times.
Established ones like USDT, USDC, and DAI are better at it, but they still face challenges.
Interesting.
What about newer stablecoins?
Are they more stable?
Newer, partially algorithmic stablecoins like USDD, DAI, and FRAX can be more unstable.
They rely on market trading to stay pegged and have faced issues during market turbulence.
That sounds risky.
Have any stablecoins failed to maintain their peg?
Yes, some like Iron Finance and Basis Cash have failed to maintain their peg.
This highlights the ongoing challenges in the stablecoin market.
Given all these issues, do you think stablecoins are a good investment?
Considering the volatility and the dominance of a few players, I would say stablecoins present more risks than benefits at this point.
They are not a favorable investment in the current market conditions.
Thanks for the insight, Kang-hoon.
So, overall, would you say this news is good or bad for the market?
I would categorize this as bad news.
The inability to maintain pegs and the dominance of a few players indicate instability and risk, which are not favorable for the market.
Got it.
Thanks for explaining everything so clearly.😊
Upon comprehensive consideration, this news is perceived as a 😱Bearish.