Wed, September 18, 2024 at 23:33
Hello, Annie.
Today, I want to discuss a recent development involving the SEC and the DeFi platform, Rari Capital.
An ex-SEC official, Michael Liftik, has raised concerns about the regulatory body's approach to digital assets.
Oh, interesting!
What exactly did Michael Liftik say?🤔
Liftik criticized the SEC for its reluctance to issue clear guidelines for digital assets while aggressively pursuing enforcement actions against firms in the sector.
He emphasized that this approach creates a challenging environment for companies trying to comply with evolving rules.
That sounds quite problematic.
What was the issue with Rari Capital specifically?😮
Rari Capital faced accusations of misleading investors and engaging in unregistered broker activity.
Their Earn pools, which were marketed as being able to autonomously manage and rebalance investments, actually required manual intervention.
So they weren't as autonomous as they claimed.
What about their Fuse pools?
Were there issues there too?
Yes, the SEC found that the co-founders of Rari Capital were involved in broker activities without proper registration.
At its peak, the platform held over $1 billion in assets.
Wow, that's a lot of money!
Did Rari Capital admit to these charges?
No, they neither admitted nor denied the charges but agreed to cease breaking securities laws in the future.
This is a common practice in settlements to avoid prolonged legal battles.
I see.
What about the hack incident in May 2022?
How did that affect Rari Capital?
The hack led to the theft of $80 million from their Fuse borrowing and lending platform.
This forced Rari Capital to halt new deposits and eventually shut down the platform.
The SEC acknowledged their cooperation in returning performance-based fees to affected users.
That's a huge loss.
How is the current regulatory environment affecting the crypto industry overall?
The regulatory environment is quite contentious.
There's a growing divide in Congress over how to regulate the digital asset industry.
Some lawmakers view crypto as a partisan issue, which complicates the crafting of comprehensive legislation.
It sounds like a tough situation for everyone involved.
Do you think this news is good or bad for the market?
I would say it's a negative development.
The lack of clear guidelines and the aggressive enforcement actions create uncertainty, which can stifle innovation and deter investment in the sector.
That's unfortunate.
Thank you for explaining everything, Kang-hoon.🙏
You're welcome, Annie.
Always here to help you understand the complexities of the market.
Upon comprehensive consideration, this news is perceived as a 😱Bearish.