Thu, September 19, 2024 at 02:07
Hello, Annie.
Today, I have some significant news regarding the recent actions taken by the U.S. Federal Reserve and the subsequent response from the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in Korea.
Oh, interesting!
What exactly did the Federal Reserve do?😊
The Federal Reserve made a 'big cut,' reducing the benchmark interest rate by 0.50 percentage points.
This move was aimed at addressing financial market volatility.
A big cut, huh?
How did the FSS respond to this?
The FSS decided to liquidate yen carry funds and intensify inspections on rising household debt and deferred real estate project financing defaults.
They are taking these measures to stabilize the financial market.
Wow, that's quite a response!
What did the BOK do?
The Bank of Korea (BOK) held a 'Financial Situation Review Meeting' chaired by Governor Lee Bok-hyun immediately after the Fed's big cut.
They are closely monitoring the financial markets and preparing to respond quickly in the future monetary policy transition process.
Governor Lee mentioned something about past interest rate cuts.
What did he say?
He noted that in past cases of U.S. interest rate cuts, there were instances of a soft landing of the U.S. economy within a year, but sometimes it led to a recession, causing volatility in the financial markets.
Hence, they are being cautious.
That makes sense.
What about the international financial markets?
Governor Lee highlighted that as countries differentiate their monetary policies, volatility in international financial markets may increase due to differences in economic indicators and market expectations.
There's a possibility of rapid capital movements, so they need to maintain stable foreign exchange conditions.
How are they planning to manage household debt?
They are examining the effectiveness of household debt management measures, such as the two-stage stressed DSR and the strengthening of voluntary examination standards for banks.
They aim to maintain a stable management framework for household loans and prepare for timely implementation of macroprudential management measures.
And what about real estate project financing?
The second round of business performance evaluation of PF businesses should be strictly conducted by November, with thorough follow-up management to ensure there is no deferral or concealment of non-performing PF loans.
However, they also encourage financial support for businesses that are in good health or have recovered through reorganization and restructuring.
What about second-tier financial companies?
For second-tier financial companies with deteriorating asset quality, such as rising delinquency rates, they need to clean up non-performing assets and increase capital.
Weak financial companies should strengthen prudential management through management evaluation and on-site inspections.
It sounds like they are taking comprehensive measures.
What is the ultimate goal here?
The ultimate goal is to ensure that financial companies are prepared to provide sufficient funds to productive sectors, especially now that interest rates are starting to be cut.
This is crucial for the economy to take off.
Got it.
So, do you think this news is good or bad for the market?
I would say it's more of a negative development.
The need for such extensive measures indicates underlying instability and potential risks in the financial system.
This could lead to increased market volatility in the short term.
Upon comprehensive consideration, this news is perceived as a 😱Bearish.